Question:
Would a rescue adopt to an overweight rider?
Analise
2013-07-17 04:13:37 UTC
I'm not small. FAR from it actually. My cousin is about the same size as me, and she rides regular horses, but most of her weight is in her boobs. Like seriously, we both got the same genes, but hers ended up top heavy, and mine ended up bottom heavy. If only we could have evened out haha.

Still, I don't feel comfortable riding a normal sized horse, because one, I don't want to hurt them, and two, while I know it's ridiculous, I don't want other people making comments about an overweight rider riding a small horse.
I've heard of certain equestrian centers having secret scales behind the scenes weighing riders before they put them on their horses, and I know it's been a heavily debated topic for the longest time.

I didn't even consider a rider weight limit until I got on a rescue's website and they said "we currently don't have any horses that can accommodate riders over 145 pounds." and started doing research on rider weight limits.

So I've been searching for a good, big-boned horse, and I've really settled on wanting a shorter Percheron or Shire-cross.
I'm just worried about going to a rescue though. As I've been out of riding for a LONG time, my mom would be the one to test out the horses and ride them around, but I'm scared that if they find out the horse is for me, and they realize that the horse is going to an overweight rider, they'll decline the application.

So, what do you think? Will I have a harder time adopting a horse because I'm overweight? I'm looking for a big-boned horse that can support my weight, but I'm afraid even that won't be enough.

Thanks so much!
Nine answers:
gallop
2013-07-17 18:04:24 UTC
Many men weigh up to 300 lbs and find horses to efficiently carry them.

Some of the internationally recognized experts on equine anatomy, conformation, biomechanics, and exercise physiology have published information and advice on this issue. The antiquated idea that an arbitrary percentage of a horse's own body weight can be accurately applied to calculate the weight-carrying capacity turns out to be false.



In fact, any horse weighing over 1450 lbs is now known to be poorly designed to carry any more than its own enormous body mass since the amount of bone/tendon circumference required to support any additional weight on the horse's back has never been attained by any horse of any breed. In other words, massive draft breeds weighing over 1450 pounds are not ideally suited for carrying any weight on their backs without risk of soundness issues, let alone being suitable to carry heavier riders.

These horses are designed to pull heavy loads, but are not well designed for carrying weight on their backs for any kind of athletic performance. It is also harder for these horses to dissipate the excessive amount of heat yielded from the massive muscle metabolism required during their workouts.



For optimum weight carrying capacity, the way a horse is put together is more important than anything else. Of course the horse should be skeletally mature enough to carry weight.



Ideally, the horse should measure at least 8 inches of bone/tendon circumference just beneath the knee (carpus) for every 1000 pounds of his own body weight.

If an ideally fit and nourished adult horse weighs 750 lbs, you'd want him to measure a minimum of 6 inches of bone/tendon circumference (one inch for every 125 lbs of body mass) below his knees. On the other hand, if an ideally fit and nourished adult horse weighs 1500 lbs, you'd want his or her bone/tendon circumference to measure at least 12 inches just below the carpus, which realistically isn't ever going to be the case, with only 10 inches of bone/tendon circumference on a 2000 lb draft being the average maximum.



Taller is not better either when it comes to ability to carry weight. According to equine anatomist and conformation analyst Dr. Deb Bennett, any horse measuring16 hh or more and of low enough body weight to have sufficient bone mass will seldom be broad enough through the loins to efficiently support a rider's weight. A lower center of gravity also assists a horse in balancing the weight on his back, so it is best to find a horse who is just tall enough to accommodate you, and no taller than is necessary to fit with your height and build.



A short, broad, smooth deep loin is ideally suited for carrying weight on the back of a horse. The circumference of the heart girth should be virtually the same as that of the loin/groin for maximum strength. The lumbar span measured from the last rib to point of croup should ideally be no more than than the width of your hand, and the total length of the back should be proportional to the fore and hind quarters.



Other qualities to look for according to the experts include correct angles of bones below their joints, and correct bone lengths. Short bones come with shorter tendons and ligaments, and longer bones come with longer tendons and ligaments, and when the joint angles or lengths of the bones are not correctly balanced for optimum function, all of the musculoskeletal structures are more vulnerable to injuries.

Some other qualities to look for according to Dr. Bennett include:

"....A neck set high on the shoulder, with a shallow vertebral curve at the base of the neck,

moderately high withers, with a peak that lies well behind the horse's elbows, (and)

a pelvis that constitutes at least 30% of the body length and slopes from 18-22 degrees....."



The problem you may encounter is the fact that many people out there still blindly follow the antiquated 20% rule despite the fact that it is patently flawed.



A taller, heavier rider should try to find a horse under 16 hh that weighs less than 1450 lbs and is built the way I've described. Hopefully you will find a rescue facility with knowledgeable personnel who stay utd on what equine research has taught us over the years.
Janian
2013-07-17 12:41:53 UTC
Big boned does not always mean stronger, you have to take into account the horse's conformation, like the length of the horse's back.

Shires etc were bred to pull, they do not have the ideal conformation for carrying large riders, even though they look strong.



Most horses in rescues are TBs, that's an unfortunate fact. You will not find many Percherons etc as these have a better market than TBs.



Basically a horse should not carry more than 20% of it's own weight (that includes tack too).



If you feel so strongly about owning a horse then why not lose some weight to show how dedicated you are?
?
2013-07-17 12:31:04 UTC
I'm glad you're being careful and finding horse right for you. I am not against people riding if they're overweight, but like you said overweight riders shouldn't ride small horses. I know a girl that is pretty overweight and she owns a very small built Thoroughbred whom is 3 years old and OTT. Nothing against her but I don't think it's right. The horse is a baby and while working in the arena the horse drags both back legs and has trouble in corners and almost limps on the inside shoulder. I think it's important to ride a horse that's right for you.



QH's can carry lots of weight, as can Clydesdale crosses. My friend has a Clydie cross TB whom is lovely, very big boned and can carry lots of weight, although he is agile still and can jump up to a meter.



Just fine the correct horse for you, if the rescue gets a bigger horse then go for it straight away. Continue looking at non rescue horses and see if you find anything that way. There absolutely no problem on riding if you're a little overweight I will not hurt the horse, you have to remember most horses are around the 500kg mark and they are extremely strong.
Kotori
2013-07-17 14:33:21 UTC
They say a horse can carry up to 20% of their weight. Average weight for a 15hh quarter horse is 1200. 1200/100 x 20= 240. This is a nice basic formula, but more important is a horse's conformation. you want a short back, short, angled pasterns, and thick bones. there is an equation for calculating maximum load by measuring the thickness of the cannon bone. In general, chunky types (QH, halflinger) can carry over 20%, while tall thin types (TB, warmblood) should carry less.



Also important is how you will ride. weight is a lot more important for 3' jumpers, or 50 mile endurance than a mostly w/t trail horse. A lady at my barn is over 200 and rides a TB, but only W/T.
Victoria
2013-07-17 11:23:22 UTC
Well... I am slightly overweight myself, and no one except my ex-riding instructor ever mentioned it. I wouldn't worry to much about it, I have ridden a lot of smaller horses, If you want to ride a smaller more athletic horse, then you can, you never said how heavy, but, I would say that if you are over 225, you should probably ride a bigger horse, or a draft horse, but if you are under, a lot of guys ride horses, and normal weight for a 6' 2" guy is around 200 pounds. If you are less than that, you should be able to ride most horses!
chicken
2013-07-17 20:23:53 UTC
I'm 5'7". And I probably weigh 150 or 155 if I ate cake yesterday or not...teehee. But for some reason at all the lessons I've been at, they've always made me ride large ponys. I didn't know they were large ponys. They were 14. some hands... nothing under 14 hands. But I asked a trainer if I was too big for a large pony that my friend wanted me to ride. And she said I was riding a large pony right now. HUMMMM She said I probably shouldn't try anything under 14 hh....I actually like ponys and I don't care how I look because I just want to be a better rider. IDK if that helps....
anonymous
2013-07-17 12:32:45 UTC
as long as you're sensible, which you clearly are, and go for a nice chunky breed, then you'll be fine. the rescue centres will only be put off if youre going for a 15hh thoroughbred or something. if its a big horse, they wont be bothered. when you go, ask them if they think they have anything suitable, that way you wont get the awkward moment of them saying to you "you cant have this horse because youre too big for it". :) also have a look at irish draughts, real weight carriers and lovely temperaments.
?
2013-07-17 11:57:20 UTC
Your best bet is to first lose the weight before riding any horse, so you don't cause injury to the horse's back. Plus, it would be a lot kinder to the horse, as well, to not put a lot of weight on the horse.
?
2013-07-17 11:36:01 UTC
Don't look at size (to a certain extend surely you wouldn't ride a 13hh) But look at their strength. even some big horses aren't strong.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...