Question:
How effective do you consider microchips in horses?
?
2011-05-31 05:34:35 UTC
Last week there was a bit on here about microchipping, so I'm curious to see how many people think it is effective. This is more geared towards US citizens than to UK ones because microchipping policies are different here.


Personally I don't find them near as effective as a brand. I have yet to ask whether my horse is microchipped or not and have never seen a vet scan one, even for a rescue horse. Most rescues I know are small time rescues who wouldn't have the money to purchase a microchip scanner and even if they did, it wouldn't read all the different brands there are. So I fail to really see their value any better than a registered brand or a good set of pictures clearly showing each marking.

In dogs, they are a lot more effective to me since most animal control offices and humane societies have the scanners, but you do face the migration issue.

So I am curious to know everyone's opinions on them, especially with all the disasters over the past few years.
Four answers:
Pickled Pigs Feet
2011-05-31 07:34:42 UTC
I think microchipping is an inefective, impotent way to protect your horse from theft.



I have never, ever once seen anyone at a low-end auction checking for microchips on horses. Since most horses that are stolen are done so by some low-life looking to make a quick buck that is generally where they end up.



I've been involved locally with netposse and we had a rash of horse thefts some years ago in my area. The president of my OHC chapter's two family horses were stolen from their pasture even.



The horses were recovered at Shipshewana auction in Indiana, they were going to be run through the auction that night (it is predominately a kill buyer auction). They were microchipped, The microchips were never scanned. Luckily the horses were recovered as were several others that had already been sold.



It was public awareness that brought all those horses home. Netposse and the Ohio Horseman's Council were on the news nearly every evening. People were scouring auction houses and handing out flyers everywhere. The horses that had been sold and then later recovered were done so because they had been bought by honest people that notified the police that they had purchased stolen horses at auction, thank god.



The horse thieves were caught and prosecuted. Turned out to be a couple of meth-heads that stole a horse trailer and then began stealing horses to sell them at auction for drup money.



After that everyone around here started freeze-branding their horses. It's an easy way to identify a stolen horse, and someone looking to make a quick buck isn't going to take the time to tamper with it. It's a much better theft deterrent. For example, there were two horses stolen from a horse camp near here right off the picket line in the middle of the night. The horses were found tied up in the woods near a road about a mile away. They caught those would-be horse theives too and the reason they gave for dumping the horses is that they saw the horses were branded and didn't want to take the chance of them being identified. Too bad for them an alert property owner saw their truck and trailer parked on the side of the road in the middle of the night and took down their plate number.



So as a theft deterrent I think microchips are a crappy choice. Now in cases of natural disasters where it would be likely that loose animals would be getting scanned after being caught, sure. That is where I could see them being effective. But also being diligent about getting your horses out of potentially disasterous situations, keeping current records on them and having them branded would be nearly as effective.
?
2011-05-31 16:58:36 UTC
My Friesian mare has one that doesn't even work, you have to scan it with a European scanner, the US ones won't pick it up. What the difference is, I couldn't tell you.

So personally I think they're pretty much useless.

Besides that, they can get damaged, if your horse has an accident and the location that the chip is in gets hurt, then they won't work anyway.

My horse has a passport that has all her info/markings/identifiers (swirls in her case) in it anyway, so it's just overkill to have a microchip.
Lacey King
2011-05-31 12:42:03 UTC
i have noticed that alot of horses are missing and they have a microchip. a freeze mark would be the best as burgulars can see that they have something everyone can see. i dont get microchips really someone might buy the horse check for a microchip but if no one in the area knows that the horse is missing they will just check for it then get on with life.
anonymous
2011-05-31 13:56:10 UTC
Personally I think microchipping is better. A determined person can damage a brand and make it unrecognizable, it is very hard to do that to a tiny microchip you may not even know is there. And personally I just find all brands to be very ugly.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...